Auditorium

Lecturers: Júlio Pinto

Commentator: Mário Santiago de Carvalho

Chair: William Passarini

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Stream link: https://youtu.be/c_OreRQKRmU

Lecturers: Luigi Russi

Commentator: Brian Kemple

Chair: William Passarini

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Stream link: https://youtu.be/8R1Cfx5lCkI

Lecturers: Hamid Malekzadeh

Commentator: Mohammad Shafiei

Chair: William Passarini

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

To all the research community we remind to save the dates of the 15th WCS - World Congress of Semiotics.

This is exactly what the IO2S Deely organizing committee decided to do.

Further details in the WCS homepage.

Lecturer: Takafumi Kato

Commentator: Sachi Arafat

Chair: Elma Berisha

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Lecturer: Mário Santiago de Carvalho

Commentator: Hélène Leblanc

Chair: Yulia Nikitenko

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Lecturer: Wesley Chihyung Yu

Commentator:

Chair: Tim Troutman

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Lecturer: Robert W. Gehl

Commentator:

Chair: William Passarini

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Lecturer: Christopher S. Morrissey

Commentator:

Chair: Yulia Nikitenko

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Lecturer: Baranna Baker and Sofi Berstein

Commentator:

Chair: Tim Troutman

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

To all the research community we remind to save the dates of the 2nd IEF International Colloquium RtC - ROADS TO CARE.

This is exactly what the IO2S Deely organizing committee decided to do.

Further details in the RtC homepage.

Lecturer: Alexandros Ph. Lagopoulos

Commentator: Olga Lavrenova

Chair: Yulia Nikitenko

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Lecturer: Javier Clavere

Commentator:

Chair: William Passarini

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Lecturer: Anne Dymek

Commentator:

Chair: Elma Berisha

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Lecturer: Brian Kemple

Commentator:

Chair: William Passarini

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Lecturer: Massimo Leone

Commentator: Leif Weatherby

Chair: Elma Berisha

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Lecturer: Paul Cobley

Commentator: Sara Cannizzaro

Chair: Yulia Nikitenko

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Stream link:

Lecturers: Mahmoud Reza Moghaddam Shad

Commentator: Susannah Ticciati

Chair: Yulia Nikitenko

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Lecturer: Banzelão Teixeira

Commentator:

Chair: William Passarini

Meeting room: https://8x8.vc/ief_tech/io2s-deely

Stream link:

Recommendations by Remo Gramigna

Deely, J. (2009). Augustine & Poinsot. The Protosemiotic Development. Scranton, PA & London: University of Scranton Press.

Gramigna, R. (2020). Augustine's Theory of Signs, Signification, and Lying. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.

Markus, R. A. (1957). St. Augustine on Signs. Phronesis 2 (pp. 60-83).

Todorov, T. (1982). Theories of the Symbol. Trans. by C. Porter. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

Recommendations by Paniel Reyes Cárdenas

Reyes-Cárdenas, P. (2018). Scholastic Realism: A Key to Understanding Peirce’s Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Peter Lang Verlag. https://www.peterlang.com/document/1113428

Reyes-Cárdenas, P. (2018). Ideas in Development: Essays on the History of Philosophy. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://www.cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-5275-0887-3

Deely, J. (2010). Medieval Philosophy Redefined: The Development of Cenoscopic Science, AD354 to 1644 (From the Birth of Augustine to the Death of Poinsot). Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/M/bo10192605.html

Recommendations by Inna Gennadievna Merkulova

Bertrand, D., Bordron, J.-F., Darrault, I., & Fontanille, J. (Eds.) (2019). Greimas aujourd’hui: l’avenir de la structure. Actes du Congrès de l’Association Française de Sémiotique (UNESCO, 30 mai - 02 juin 2017). Paris: AFS éds. http://afsemio.fr/publications/greimas-aujourdhui-lavenir-de-la-structure-actes-du-congres-de-lafs-2017/

Greimas, A. J., Fontanille, J. (1991). Sémiotique des passions. Des états de choses aux états d’âme. Paris: Seuil.

Karsavinas, L. (2019). Apie tobulybę. Vilnius: Hubris. https://www.hubris.lt/preke/levas-karsavinas-apie-tobulybe/

[Karsavinas, L.] (2000). Lev Karsavin et l'expérience de la tout-unité temporelle chez Marcel Proust. Lesourd F. (Trans.). Slavica Occitania 10 (pp. 229-247).

Merkoulova, I. (2019). Algirdas Julien Greimas et Lev Karsavine : dialogue sémiotique et philosophique. In Bertrand, D., Bordron, J.-F., Darrault, I., & Fontanille, J. (Eds.), Greimas aujourd’hui: l’avenir de la structure. Actes du Congrès de l’Association Française de Sémiotique (UNESCO, 30 mai - 02 juin 2017). Paris: AFS éds.

Broden, T. F., & Matthews, S. W. (2017). Semiotica 214. Numero spécial: A. J. Greimas — Life and semiotics/ La vie et la sémiotique d’ A. J. Greimas. De Gruyter Mouton.

Recommendations by Alexandre Provin Sbabo

Greimas, A. J. (1943 [2016]).Cervantes and His Don Quixote. In T. Broden (Ed.) Cervantes. The Journal of the Cervantes Society of America, 36(1) (pp. 171–179). [Translated from Lithuanian by J. Korostenskiene]

Greimas, A. J. (1956 [2000]). L'actualité du saussurisme (à l'occasion du 40e anniversaire de la publication du Cours de linguistique générale). Le Français moderne, XXIV(3) (pp. 191–203). [In La Mode en 1830, pp. 371–382.]

Greimas, A. J. (1966). Sémantique structurale. Paris: Larousse.

Greimas, A. J. (1966). Structure et histoire. Les temps modernes, 246 (pp. 815–827). [In Du sens, 1970, pp. 103–115.]

Greimas, A. J. (1987). De l’imperfection. Périgueux: Pierre Fanlac.

Greimas, A. J. (1991). Karsavino aktualumas. Baltos lankos, 1, (pp. 40–42).

Karsavinas, L. (1931–1937). Europos kul tu ros istorija I–V. Kaunas: Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas.

Saussurre, F. (1971). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.

Sbabo, A. P. (2020). Um percurso diacrönico sobre as articulaçoes entre ética e estética na sémiotica de A. J. Greimas / Un parcours diachronique sur les articulations entre l’éthique et l’esthétique dans la sémiotique de A. J. Greimas (Tese de doutorado / These de doctorat). Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo / Université de Limoges. Limoges: HAL archives ouvertes. https://www.theses.fr/2020LIMO0023

Sbabo, A. P. (2021) L’esthétique et le plan de l’expression, mais pas que…. Cadernos de pós graduação em letras, 21(2) (pp. 174–190).

Recommendations by Matthew Minerd

Cessario, R. (2005). A Short History of Thomism. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.

Cessario, R., & Cuddy, C. (2017). Thomas and the Thomists: The Achievement of Thomas Aquinas and his Interpreters. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

Deely, J. N. (1997). Quid sit postmodernismus?. In R. T. Ciapalo (Ed.), Postmodernism and Christian Philosophy (pp. 68–96). Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.

Deely, J. N. (2009). In the Twilight of Neothomism, a Call for a New Beginning—A Return in Philosophy to the Idea of Progress by Deepening Insight Rather than by Substitution: A Review of The Way toward Wisdom. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 83(2) (pp. 267–278).

Deely, J. N. (2010). What Happened to Philosophy between Aquinas and Descartes. In P. Cobley (Ed.), Realism for the 21st Century (pp. 266–292). Scranton: University of Scranton Press.

Deely, J. N. (2010). A Prospect of Postmodernity. In P. Cobley (Ed.), Realism for the 21st Century (pp. 319–326). Scranton: University of Scranton Press.

Roensch, F. J. (1964). Early Thomistic School. Dubuque, IA: The Priory Press.

Recommendations by Tullio Viola

Ambrosio, C. (2016). The Historicity of Peirce’s Classification of the Sciences. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 8(2).

Gallie, W. B. (1964). Philosophy and Historical Understanding. London: Chatto & Windus.

Haack, S. (2009). The growth of meaning and the limits of formalism: in science, in law. Análisis Filosófico 29(1) (pp. 5–29).

Viola, T. (2020). Peirce on the Uses of History. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Recommendations by Donna E. West

Bergson, H. (1896 [1950]). Matter and Memory. Paul, N., & Palmer, W.S (Trans.). New York: Macmillan.

Bergson, H. (1932 [1935]). The Two Sources of Morality and Religion. Audra, R., & Brereton C. (Trans.). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

Deely, J. (2009). Purely Objective Reality. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Deely, J. (2012). Toward a postmodern recovery of “person.” Espiritu 61(143) (pp. 147-165).

Deely, J. (2015). From semiosis to semioethics. In Trifonas P. P. (Ed.), The International Handbook of Semiotics (pp. 771-789). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Deely, J. (2016). Gilson, Poinsot, Maritain, and the future of Thomism. In Dumsday, T. (Ed.), The Wisdom of Youth: Essays Inspired by the Early Work of Jacques and Raissa Maritain (pp. 245-263). Washington, D.C.: American Maritain Association Publications.

Gava, G. (2014). What is wrong with intuitions? An assessment of a Peircean criticism of Kant. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50(3) (pp. 340-359).

Kemple, B. (2017). Ens Primum Cognitum in Thomas Aquinas and the Tradition: The Philosophy of Being as First Known. Boston: Brill-Rodopi.

Maritain, J. (1932 [2014]). The Degrees of Knowledge. Phelan, G. (Trans.), McInerny, R. (Ed.). South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Maritain, J. (1934 [1966]). The Intuition of Being. In Evans, J., & Ward, L. (Eds.), Challenges and Renewal (pp. 119-132). South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press. [Reprinted in English from Sept leçons sur l’être et les premiers principes de la raison spéculative (pp. 51-70). Paris: Téqui.]

Maritain, J. (1943). Redeeming the Time. London: Centenary Press.

Maritain, J. (1946 [1966]). The Person and the Common Good. John J. Fitzgerald (Trans.). South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Maritain, J. (1947 [1966]). Existence and the Existent. L., Galantiere, & Phelan, G. (Trans.). New York: Vintage.

Maritain, J. (1957 [1986]). Language and the theory of sign. Anshen, R. N. (Trans.). In Deely, J., Williams, B., & Kruse, F. E. (Eds.), Frontiers in Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Morawiec, E. (2013). Intellectual Intuition in the General Metaphysics of Jacques Maritain: A Study in the History of the Methodology of Classical Metaphysics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Peirce, C. S. (1867-1913 [1931-1966]). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 1-6. Hartshorne, C., & Weiss, P. (Eds.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Peirce, C. S. (1867-1913 [1958]). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. 7-8. Burks, A. (Ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Peirce, C. S. (1867-1913 [1992]). The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. 1. Houser, N. & Kloesel, C. (Eds.). Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.

Peirce, C. S. (1867-1913 [1998]). The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Vol. 2. Peirce Edition Project (Eds.). Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.

Peirce, C. S. (1867-1913 [1967]). Annotated Catalogue of the Papers of Charles S. Peirce. Robin, R. (Ed.). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press. [Resource for dating unpublished manuscripts confirmed by the Peirce Edition Project, Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis].

Peirce, C. S. (i. 1866–1913 [1976]). The New Elements of Mathematics. Vol IV. Eisele, C. (Ed.). The Hague: Mouton Press.

Short, T. L. (2007). Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

West, D. (2013). Deictic Imaginings: Semiotics at Work and at Play. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

West, D. (2016). Indexical Scaffolds to Habit-Formation. In West, D. & Anderson, M. (Eds.), Consensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit (pp. 215-240). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

West, D. (2018). Deely’s extension of Peirce’s thirdness: Pregenerativity. The American Journal of Semiotics 34(1/2) (pp. 39-64).

West, D. (2019). Thirdness along the intuitional path: Reflections on Maritain and Peirce. Studia Gilsoniana 8(2) (pp. 431-475).

Recommendations by Marek Tamm

Lotman, J. (1970-1994 [2020]). Culture and Communication: Signs in Flux. An Anthology of Major and Lesser-Known Works. A. Schönle (Ed.), & B. Paloff (Trans.). Boston: Academic Studies Press.

Lotman, J. (1978-1992 [2019]). Culture, Memory and History: Essays in Cultural Semiotics. Tamm, M. (Ed.), Baer, B.B. (Trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lotman, J. (1990). The Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Shukman, A. (Trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Lotman, J. (1992 [2009]). Culture and Explosion. Grishakova, M. (Ed.), Clark, W. (Trans.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Tamm, M., & Torop P. (Eds.) (2022). The Companion to Juri Lotman. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

Recommendations by Banzelão Teixeira and Scott Randall Paine

Bains, Paul (2006). The Primacy of Semiosis: An Ontology of Relations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. [especially Chapter 3.]

Clarke S.J., W. Norris (1994). Explorations in Metaphysics. University of Notre Dame Press.

Deely, John (1975). Reference to the Non-existent. The Thomist, 39 (pp. 253-308).

Deely, John (1994). New Beginnings: Early Modern Philosophy and Postmodern Thought. University of Toronto Press.

Deely, John (2001). Four Ages of Understanding: The First Postmodern History of Philosophy from Ancient Times to the Turn of the 21^st Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Deely, John (2002). What Distinguishes Human Understanding?. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.

Deely, John (2005). Defining the Semiotic Animal: A Postmodern Definition of Human Being Superseding the Modern Definition ‘Res Cogitans’ . Sofia, Bulgaria: Tip-Top Press.

Deely, John (2007). Intentionality and Semiotics: A Tale of Mutual Fecundation. Scranton, PA: Scranton University Press.

Deely, John (2008). Descartes & Poinsot: The Crossroad of Signs and Ideas. Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press.

Deely, John (2009). Purely Objective Reality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Deely, John (2014). ‘Semiotic Entanglement’: The Concepts of Environment, Umwelt, and Lebenswelt in Semiotic Perspective. Semiotica, 199 (pp. 7-42).

Deely, John (2015). Objective Reality and the Physical World: Relation as Key to Understanding Semiosis. Green Studies: Studies in Ecocriticism 19.3 (pp. 267-279).

Deely, John (2016). Uninstantiability. Semiotica, 208.1/4 (pp. 1-20).

Girard, René (1978 [1987]). Things Hidden Since the Foundation of the World.Bloomsbury: Stanford University Press. [Translated from French by Stephen Bann & Michael Metteer.]

Hood, Pamela (2004). Aristotle of the Category of Relation. Lanham – New York – Oxford: University of America Press.

Kemple, Brian (2017). Ens Primum Cognitum in Thomas Aquinas and the Tradition: The Philosophy of Being as First Known. Leidon – Boston: Brill Rodopi. [especially Chapter 5.]

Krempel, A. (1952). La Doctrine de la Relation chez Saint Thomas – Exposé Historique et Systématique. Paris: J. Vrin.

McGilchrist, Iain (2009). The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. Yale University Press.

McGilchrist, Iain (2019). Ways of Attending: How Our Divided Brain Constructs the World. Routledge.

McGilchrist, Iain (2021). The Matter With Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World. UK: Perspectiva Press.

Rosenstock-Huessy, Eugen (1970). Speech and Reality. Montreal: Argo Books.

Rosenstock-Huessy, Eugen (1981). Origin of Speech. Montreal: Argo Books.

Teixeira, Banzelão (2018). 21^st Century Realism: John Deely’s Recovery of Poinsot’s Doctrine of Signs. New Delhi: Media House. [especially Chapters 2, 4 & 5.]

Recommendations by António Manuel Martins

Carvalho, Mário Santiago de, & Guidi, Simone (eds.) (2020). Pedro Da Fonseca: A Bibliography. In: Conimbricenses.Org Encyclopedia. Coimbra: Instituto de Estudos Filosóficos. http://www.conimbricenses.org/bibliographies/pedro-da-fonseca/

Deely, J. (2010). Medieval Philosophy Redefined: The Development of Cenoscopic Science, AD354 to 1644 (From the Birth of Augustine to the Death of Poinsot). Scranton, PA: University of Scranton Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/M/bo10192605.html

Romeo, Luigi (1979). Pedro da Fonseca in Renaissance Semiotics: A Segmental History os Footnotes. Ars Semeiotica, II. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

Recommendations by Rocco Gangle

Deely, J. (1971). The Tradition via Heidegger: An Essay on the Meaning of Being in the Philosophy of Martin Heidegger. The Hague: Martinus Nijoff.

Derrida, J. (1964-1965 [2016]). Heidegger: The Question of Being and History. Trans. by G. Bennington, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Haar, M. (1990 [1993]). Heidegger and the Essence of Man. Trans. by W. McNeill, Albany: SUNY Press.

Harman, G (2002). Tool-Being: Heidegger and Metaphysics of objects. Chicago: Open Court.

Heidegger, M. (1920-1921 [2004]). The Phenomenology of Religious Life, trans. M. Fritsch and J.A. Gosetti-Ferencei, Bloomington: Indiana University Press

Heidegger, M. (1927 [2010]). Being and Time. Trans. by J. Stambaugh. Albany: SUNY Press.

Heidegger, M. (1928 [1984]). The Metaphysical Foundations of Logic. Trans. by M. Heim. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Heidegger, M. (1936-1938 [2012]). Contributions to Philosophy (on the Event). Trans. by R. Rojcewicz & D. Vallega-Neu, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Heidegger, M. (1936-1968 [2000]). Elucidation of Hölderlin's Poetry. Trans. by K. Hoeller. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.

Heidegger, M. (1954 [1968]). What is called Thinking?. Trans. by J. G. Gray. New York: Harper & Row.

Husserl, E. (1900-1901 [1970]). Logical Investigations, 2 vols.. Trans. by J.N. Findlay. London & New York: Routledge.

Kemple, B. (2019). The Intersection of Semiotics and Phenomenology: Peirce and Heidegger in Dialogue. Boston & Berlin: De Gruyter.

Kisiel, T. (1993). The Genesis of Heidegger's Being and Time. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Maritain, J. (1932 [1995]). The Degrees of Knowledge. Trans. by G.B. Phelan. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Nancy, J.-L. (1983-1999 [2003]). A Finite Thinking. Ed. by S. Sparks. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Ricoeur, P. (1983-1985 [1984-1988]). Time and Narrative, 3 vols.. Trans. by K. McLaughlin et al. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Schürmann, R. (1982 [1987]). Heidegger on Being and Acting: From Principles to Anarchy. Trans. by C. Gros. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Recommendations by Bujar Hoxha

Eco, U. (1994). Six Walks in the Fictional Woods. Cambridge, MA & London, UK: Harvard University Press.

Eco, U. (1997 [2000]). Kant and the Platypus. London: Vintage.

Hoxha, B. (2022). Umberto Eco's Semiotics: Theory, Methodology and Poetics. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Recommendations by Tony Jappy

Ambrosio, C. (2016), The Historicity of Peirce's Classification of the Sciences, European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy [Online], VIII-2, 2016, Online since 17 January 2017, URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/625; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.625.

Legg, C. (2021), Discursive habits: a representationalist re-reading of teleosemiotics, Synthese 199, 14751—14768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03442-8.

Heidegger, M. (1954 [1982]), Science and Reflection. In The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, New York: Harper Torchbooks.

Noë, A., (2010), Out of Our Heads: Why You are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons From the Biology of Consciousness, New York: Hill & Wang.

Sebeok, T.A. (2001), Signs: An Introduction to Semiotics, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Recommendations by Marc Champagne

Aristotle (4th century BCE [1984]). The Complete Works of Aristotle. Volume 1. Ed. by J. Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Bains, P. (2006). The Primacy of Semiosis : An Ontology of Relations. Toronto, London and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.

Burnet, J. (2003). Early Greek Philosophy. Whitefish: Kessinger.

Champagne, M. (2008). What Anchors Semiosis: How Descartes Changed the Subject. Recherches sémiotiques / Semiotic Inquiry 28(3-1), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.7202/1005869ar

Clarke, D. M. (2006). Descartes: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Danesi, M. (2010). The History of Philosophy as Semiotic Process: A Note on John Deely’s Monumental Four Ages of Understanding. In Semiotica 178 (1-4): 23-37.

Deely, J. (1990). Basics of Semiotics. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Deely, J. (2000). The Latin Foundations for Semiotic Consciousness: Augustine (5th Century A.D.) to Poinsot (17th Century). In RS/SI (Recherches Sémiotiques/ Semiotic Inquiry) 20 (1-3): 11-32.

Deely, J. (2001). Four Ages of Understanding: The First Postmodern Survey of Philosophy from Ancient Times to the Turn of the Twenty-first Century. Toronto, London and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.

Deely, J. (2003). The Word ‘Semiotics’: Formation and Origins. In Semiotica 146 (1-4), 1-49.

Deely, J. (2007). Intentionality and Semiotics: A Story of Mutual Fecundation. Scranton and London: University of Scranton Press.

Deely, J. (2008). Descartes and Poinsot: The Crossroad of Signs and Ideas. Scranton and London: University of Scranton Press.

Descartes, R. (17th century [1984]). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Volume 2. Trans. by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Descartes, R. (17th century [1985]). The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Volume 1. Trans. by Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haworth, K. A., & Prewitt, T. J. (2010). Two Steps Toward Semiotic Capacity: Out of the Muddy Concept of Language. In Semiotica 178 (1-4): 53-79.

Hittinger, J. P. (2010). Why Read Deely?. In Semiotica 178 (1-4): 4-9.

Houser, N. (2010). The Church of Pragmatism. In Semiotica 178 (1-4): 105-114.

Husserl, E. (1931 [1999]). Cartesian Meditations. Trans. by D. Cairns. Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic.

Jeffreys. D. S. (2010). Is Modernity Really so Bad? John Deely and Husserl’s Phenomenology. In Semiotica 178 (1-4): 115-133.

Kant, I. (1781 [1998]). Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. by P. Guyer & A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962 [1996]). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Third edition, revised and augmented. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970-1993 [2002]). The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970-1993. Ed. by J. Conant & J. Haugeland. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Latraverse, F. (1998). Locke et le retournement sémantique. In Sémiotiques 14: 19-30.

Lisska, A. J. (2010). Deely, Aquinas, and Poinsot: How the Intentionality of Inner Sense Transcends the Limits of Empiricism. In Semiotica 178 (1-4): 135-167.

Locke, J. (1689 [2008]). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Peirce, C. S. (1893-1913 [1998]). The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings. Volume 2. Ed. by the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Tarnas, R. (1993). The Passion of the Western Mind: Understanding the Ideas that Have Shaped Our World View. New York: Ballantine.

Common recommendation

Deely, J. (2009). Purely objective reality. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Recommendations by Farouk Y. Seif

Deely, J. (2001). Four ages of understanding: the first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442675032

Deely, J. (2007). Intentionality and Semiotics: A Story of Mutual Fecundation. University of Scranton Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/I/bo5459810.html

Gebser, J. (1985). The ever-present origin. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.

Peirce, C. S. (1839–1914). The Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, Vols. I–VI, ed. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss. Vols. VII–VIII, ed. A. W. Burks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sartre, J.-P. (1948). The Psychology of Imagination, trans. J. Webber. New York: Philosophical Library.

Seif, F. Y. (2015). Reality Beyond Humanities-Science Schism: : Revealing the Mutuality of Design and Semiotics. The American Journal of Semiotics, 31(3–4), 311–336.

Seif, F. Y. (2018). Imaginary Dialogue with John Deely: Playing with Boundaries Across Space and Time. The American Journal of Semiotics, 34.1–2, 189–227.

Seif, F. Y. (2018). Wholophilia: Design and the Metamorphoses of the Absolute. In D. Teters & O. Neumaier (Eds.) Metamorphoses of the Absolute (pp. 237-256). UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Farouk, Y. S. (2019). Beyond Forecasting and Prediction: The Role of Phantasmagorical Memory in Imagining the Future. Вісник КНЛУ. Серія Філологія [Bulletin of the National Linguistic University of Kyiv. Philology Series], 22(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.32589/2311-0821.1.2019.170192

Seif, F. Y. (2020). De-Sign as a Destiny of Negation: The Paradox of Sustaining Boundaries While Traversing Borders. The American Journal of Semiotics, 36.3–4, 179–215.

Seif, F. Y. (2020). The Role of Pragmatism in De-Sign: Persevering Through Paradoxes of Design and Semiotics. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, 21.1, 112–131.

Recommendations by Maurício Neubern

Deely, J. (2010). Semiotic animal: a postmodern definition of human being transcending patriarchy and feminism: to supersede the ancient and medieval “animal rationale” along with the modern “res cogitans.” South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.

Erickson, M. H., & Rossi, E. L. (1979). Hypnotherapy, an exploratory casebook. New York: Irvington Publishers : Distributed by Halsted Press.

Kopenawa, D., Albert, B., Elliott, N., & Dundy, A. (2013). The falling sky: words of a Yanomami shaman. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674726116

Nathan, T. (2015). Nous ne sommes pas seuls au monde. Les enjeux de l’ethnopsychiatrie. Paris: Points.

Neubern, M. da S. (2016). Iconicity and Complexity in Hypnotic Communication. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 32(spe). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-3772e32ne217

Neubern, M. da S. (2019). Complex hypnosis contributions to clinical psychology. In C. Antloga, K. T. Brasil, S. R. Lordello, M. Neubern, & E. Queiroz (Eds.), Psicologia clínica e cultura contemporânea 4 (pp. 71–90). Brasília: Technopolitik.

Seif, F. Y. (2019). «De-Sign» in the Transmodern World. Bern and New York: Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften. https://www.peterlang.com/document/1055255

Stengers, I. (2002). L’Hypnose entre magie et science (Psychanalyse et psychiatrie edition.). Paris: Empecheurs.

Stengers, I. (2001). Qu’est-ce que l’hypnose nous oblige à penser ?. Ethnopsy, 3, 13–68.

Recommendations by Göran Sonesson

Sonesson G. (2021). Nothing human is foreign to me - except some of it. From the semiotic tradition to cognitive semiotic by the way of phenomenology. Degrés, 186-187 (pp. b1-b23).

Sonesson G. (2021). Considerations on the subtle art of integrating linguistics (and/or semiotics). K. Willems & C. Munteanu (Eds.) In Eugenio Coseriu: past, present and future (pp. 151-164). Berlin: deGruyter.

Sonesson G. (2019) The Psammetichus Syndrome and Beyond: Five Experimental Approaches to Meaning-Making. The American Journal of Semiotics, 35.1–2 (pp. 11–32).

Sonesson G. (2019) Elements of Peircean phenomenology. From categories to signs by way of grounds. Semiotica, 228 (pp. 259–285). https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0086

Sonesson G. (2019) La sémiotique cognitive. Le même et l’autre de la sémiotique structurale. In A. Biglari (Ed.) La sémiotique et son autre (pp. 147-160). Paris: Kimé.

Sonesson G. (2018) Meaning Redefined: Reflections on the Scholastic Heritage Conveyed by John Deely to Contemporary Semiotics. The American Journal of Semiotics, 34.1–2 (pp. 65–86).

Sonesson G. (2017) Mastering phenomenological semiotics with Husserl and Peirce. In K. Bankov & P. Cobley (Eds.) Semiotics and its masters, 1 (pp. 83-104). Berlin: de Gruyter.

Recommendations by Juan Mendoza-Collazos

Mendoza-Collazos, J., & Zlatev, J. (2022). A Cognitive-Semiotic Approach to Agency: Assessing Ideas from Cognitive Scienc and Neuroscience. Biosemiotics, 1-30. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12304-022-09473-z

Mendoza-Collazos, J. C., Zlatev, J., & Sonesson, G. (2021). The origins and evolution of design: A stage-based model. In E. Pagni & R. Theisen (Eds.), Biosemiotics: The natural foundations of symbolism. Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-85265-8_8

Mendoza-Collazos, J. C. (2020). On the importance of things: a relational approach to agency. Cognitive Semiotics, 13.2, 1–11. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2034/html

Mendoza-Collazos, J. C., & Sonesson, G. (2021). Revisiting the life of things: A cognitive semiotic study of the agency of artefacts in Amazonia. Public Journal of Semiotics, 9.2, 30–52. https://journals.lub.lu.se/pjos/article/view/22012

Recommendations by Alexandra Milyakina

Negotiating Spaces for Literacy Learning: Multimodality and Governmentality (2015) ed. M. Hamilton, R. Heydon, K. Hibbert, & R. Stooke. London; New York: Bloomsbury.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.

Lotman, J. (1990). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London: I.B. Tauris & Co.

Popovič, A., & Macri, F.M. (1977). Literary Synthesis. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature, 4.2, 118-132.

Ojamaa, M., & Torop P. (2015). Transmediality of cultural autocommunication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 18.1, 61–78.

Torop, P.; Ojamaa, M.; Fadeev, A.; Milyakina, A.; Pilipovec, T.; Rickberg, M. (2019) Culture as education: transmediality and digitality in cultural autocommunication. Sign Systems Studies, 47.1/2, 152−176.

Scolari, C.A., Masanet, M.-J., Guerrero-Pico, M., & Establés, M.-J. (2018). Transmedia literacy in the new media ecology: Teens’ transmedia skills and informal learning strategies. El profesional de la información, 27.4, 801-812.

Unsworth, L. (2006). E-literature for children: Enhancing digital literacy learning. Oxford, UK: Routledge.

Recommendations by Maurício Neubern

Akstein, D. (1973). Terpsichoretherapy: a new hypnotherapeutic method. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 21, 121–129.

Akstein, D. (1992). Un voyage à travers la Terpsichore – Transe – Thérapie. Paris: Sand/Tchou.

Bioy, A. & Servillat, T. (2017), Construire la communication thérapeutique avec l’hypnose. Paris, France: Dunod.

Brentano, F. (1887 [1995]). Descriptive psychology. Routledge.

Calcaterra, R. (2011). Varieties of synechism: Peirce and James on mind-world continuity. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 25 (4), 412–424.

Carroy, J. (1991). L’invention des sujets. Hypnose et suggestion. Paris: Puf.

Chertok, L. & Stengers, I. (1989). Le Coeur et la raison. L’hypnose en question de Lavoisier à Lacan. Paris: Payot.

Clément, C. (2011). L’appel de la transe. Paris: Stok.

Colapietro, V. (1989). Peirce’s approach to the self. Suny.

Colapietro, V. (2016). Habits, awareness, and autonomy. In D. West & M. Anderson (Eds.). Consensus on Peirce’s concept of habit. (pp. 297–313). Springer.

Deely, J. (2002). What distinguishes human understanding? Indiana: Saint Augustine Press.

Deely, J. (2009). Purely objective reality. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyer.

Deely, J. (2010). Semiotic animal. Indiana: Saint Augustine Press.

Erickson, B. & Keeney, B. (2006). Milton H. Erickson, MD.: An american healer. Sedona: Ringing Rook Press.

Erickson, M. & Rossi, E. (1979). Hypnotherapy: an exploratory casebook. New York: Irvington.

Erickson, M. & Rossi, E. (1980). The collected papers of Milton Erickson, MD. New York: Irvington.

Erickson, M. (1992). Creative choice in hypnosis. Irvington.

Fann, K. T. (2010). Peirce’s theory of abduction. Partridge.

Favareau, D. (2010). Essential readings in biosemiotics. Springer.

Gallagher, S. (2012). Multiple aspects of agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 15–31.

Gergen, K. (1996). Realidad y relaciones. Paidós.

Gonzalez Rey, F. (2019). Subjectivity in debate: some reconstructed philosophical premises to advance its debates in psychology. Journal of Theory and Social Behavior, 49, 1–23.

Gordin, M. (2021). On the fringe. Where science meets pseudoscience. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the soul. Multiple personalities and the sciences of memory. Princeton : Princeton University Press.

Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Harvard University Press.

Ibri, I. (2015). Kósmos Nóetos. The metaphysical architecture of Charles Peirce. Bern: Springer.

Jappy, T. (2018). Peirce’s twenty-eight classes of signs and the philosophy of representation. Bloomsbury.

Koch, S. (1981). Nature and limits of psychological knowledge. American Psychologist, 36 (3), 257–269.

Kuhn, T. (1962 [2012]). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lévy, A. (1997). Sciences cliniques et organisations sociales. Puf.

Liszka, J. (1996). A general introduction to the semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Indiana University Press.

Morin, E. (2014). La méthode V. l’Identité humanine. L’humanité de l’humanité. Seuil. (original work published 1991).

Nathan, T. (2014). Nous ne sommes pas seuls au monde. Seuil.

Neubern, M. (2016). Iconicity and complexity in hypnotic communication. Psicologia: Teoria & Pesquisa, 32, 1–9.

Neubern, M. (2017). Iconicity as a possibility of qualitative research. Psicologia em Estudo, 22 (4), 505–515.

Neubern, M. (2018). Clínicas do transe. Etnopsicologia, hipnose e subjetividade no Brasil. Juruá: Curitiba.

Neubern, M. & Nogueira, H. (2019). Complex hypnosis contribution to clinical psychology. In: C. Antloga, K. Brasil, S. Lordello, M. Neubern, E. Queiroz (Eds.). Psicologia Clínica e Cultura 4. (pp. 71–90). Technopolitik.

Nöth, W. (2012). Charles Peirce’s theory of information: a theory of growth of symbols and knowledge. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 19 (2), 137–161.

Nöth, W. (2015). The paradigms of iconicity in language and literature. In M. Hiraga; W. Herlofsky; K. Shinohara & K. Akita. (Eds.). Iconicity: East meets west. (pp. 13–34). Amsterdan, Nederland: John Benjamins.

Nöth, W. (2016). Habits, habit change, and the habit of habit change according to Peirce. In D. West & A. Myrdene (Eds.). Consensus on Peirce’s concept of habit. Before and beyond consciousness. (pp. 35–64). Springer.

Peirce, C. (1866-1913 [1931-1958]). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (8 vols). In A. Burks (Ed.). Harvard University Press.

Peirce, C. (1893-1913 [1998]). The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings, Volume 2: 1893-1913. N. Houser (Ed.). Indiana University Press.

Peirce, C. (1903 [1997]). Pragmatism as a principle and method of right thinking. The 1903 Harvard lectures on pragmatism. P. Turrisi, (Ed.). State of New York Press.

Petrilli, S. (2017). The self as a sign, the world, and the other. Routledge.

Psillos, S. & Zorzato, L. (2021). Against cognitive instrumentalism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 33 (4): 1–11.

Raposa, M. (2020). Theosemiotics: religion, reading and the gift of meaning. New York: Fordham University Press.

Roustang, F. (2015). Jamais contre, d’abord. La présence d’un corps. Odile Jacob.

Santaella, L. (2004). O método anticartesiano de C. S. Peirce. Unifesp.

Santos, B. & Meneses, M. (2009). Epistemologias do sul. Cortez.

Schechner, R. (2013). Performance studies. An introduction. London, England: Routledge.

Seif, F. (2019). De-sing in transmodern world. Envisioning reality beyond absoluteness. Peter Lang.

Seif, F. (2020). The role of pragmatism in De-sign: persevering through paradoxes of design and semiotics. Cognitio, 21 (1): 112–131.

Sharov, A. & Thonnessen, M. (2022). Semiotics agency. Bern: Springer.

Stengers, I. (1995). L’invention des sciences modernes. Flammarion.

Stengers, I. (2001). Qu’est-ce que l’hypnose nous oblige à penser ?. Ethnopsy, 3, 13–68.

Stengers, I. (2002). Hypnose : entre magie et science. Paris : Synthélabo.

Tukaev, R. (2020). The integrative theory of hypnosis in the light of clinical hypnotherapy. In: Mordeniz, C. (ed). Hypnosis and Hypnotherapy. (pp. 234–249). Namik Kemal University.

Whitehead, A. (1929 [1978]). Process and reality. The Free Press.

Recommendations by Anton Markoš

Deely, J. (2009). Purely objective reality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Deely, J. (2009). Augustine & Poinsot. Scranton: University of Scranton Press.

Deely, J. (2010). Medieval philosophy redefined. Scranton: University of Scranton Press.

Markoš, A. (2002). Readers of the Book of life. Contextualizing developmental evolutionary biology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Markoš, A. (2016). The birth and life of species–cultures. Biosemiotics, 9 (pp. 73–84). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9252-1.

Markoš, A., Grygat, F., Hajnal, L., Kratochvíl, Z., & Neubauer, Z. (2009). Life as its own designer. Darwins Origin and Western thought. Springer.

Markoš, A., Švorcová, J. (2019). Epigenetic processes and the evolution of life. CRC Press.

Švorcová, J., Markoš, A., Das, P. (2017). Origins of the Cellular Biosphere. In Sahi, V. P. & Baluska, F. (Eds.), Concepts in Cell Biology - History and Evolution (pp. 271–290). Springer.